For decades, the conversation around vaccines has been treated as an all-or-nothing debate. But what if the real answer lies somewhere in between? What if, instead of a one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule, we considered a more personalized approach—one that takes into account genetic differences, environmental factors, and historical medical injustices?

For those who believe in the sanctity of life, abortion is already one of the greatest moral failings of our time. The idea that a child’s life can be ended before birth is devastating enough. But what if that child’s body is then used as a commodity? What if, after an abortion, the remains of that baby—tiny hands, a beating heart, fragile limbs—are collected, stored, and sold for medical research?

Imagine walking into your doctor’s office, trusting that every recommendation—every prescription, every treatment—is based purely on what’s best for you and your family. Now, imagine discovering that, behind the scenes, pharmaceutical companies are quietly shaping those decisions—not through groundbreaking medical advancements, but through financial incentives, consulting contracts, and hefty speaking fees paid to the very doctors you rely on.